Laura Spence Affair Totally Explained

Everything about The Laura Spence Affair totally explained

The Laura Spence Affair was a British political controversy in 2000, ignited after the failure of high-flying state school pupil Laura Spence to secure a place at the University of Oxford.

Background

Laura Spence was a pupil at Monkseaton Community High School, a state school in Whitley Bay, North Tyneside. In 1999, she was the only pupil out of 100 in her sixth-form class to apply for a university place at Oxbridge, as one of 22 students who applied for 5 places to read medicine at Magdalen College, University of Oxford, all with 10 GCSEs at grade A* and high predicted A-level grades. Spence had also been predicted five straight A grades at A level (in General Studies - which is regarded as non-academic by Britain's top universities - Geography, English, Biology, and Chemistry), which she indeed subsequently achieved. (admission is based on the three highest grades at A-level, though most pupils are not given the opportunity to take more than three. Spence was nevertheless not accepted after an interview because the panel believed, as one media report put it, that she "did not show potential".
It was subsequently reported in the British media that Spence was one of ten British students to have "won" a £65,000 scholarship by Harvard University in the United States, where she intended to study biochemistry.)

Political row

The political row broke out when Labour MP and then Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown (who later became prime minister) commented on the decision at a Trades Union Congress reception. Brown accused Oxford of elitism, saying it was an "absolute scandal" and that he believed Spence had been discriminated against by an "an old establishment interview system". Dr Colin Lucas, vice-chancellor of Oxford, said that Brown's remarks were "disappointing", and an unnamed Conservative spokesman reportedly told the BBC: "This is ignorant prejudice. Why doesn't Gordon Brown get on with delivering at least some of the things Labour were elected on, rather than telling universities which candidates they should pick for which courses, when he can't possibly know the full facts."
   Her headteacher, Dr Paul Kelley, also said he believed Oxford was "missing out" and that he thought that Spence had been rejected because of her being from the north east of England. Oxford denied that allegation, pointing out it received a similar number of applications from state schools and private schools in the north east of England, and accepted a similar proportion from each. Spence herself didn't get involved in the arguments, subsequently saying that she tried to ignore the row by focussing on revision and not watching television for a week.
   These assertions triggered a debate between opponents and supporters of the Chancellor's remarks. Those who disagreed advanced a range of arguments: some believed there was no discrimination; some felt Brown didn't have his facts straight and therefore shouldn't have offered a public opinion; and some believed that Oxford was correct in not offering Laura Spence a place. When the issue was raised at an Oxford edition of the BBC's political discussion show Question Time in October 2000, Professor Robert Winston said that Spence didn't deserve a place, because "you have to be committed to the course, and Laura Spence clearly wasn't committed because she didn't even end up studying medicine."
   In a House of Lords debate on Higher Education on the 15 June 2000, Lord Jenkins of Hillhead, a Liberal Democrat peer and then Chancellor of Oxford University, criticised Brown for his comments on student admissions, saying that "nearly every fact he used was false", and that Brown's speech on Spence had been a "little Blitzkrieg in being an act of sudden unprovoked aggression", but "The target was singularly ill-chosen." Conservative peer Baroness Young stated that it was "an ultimate disgrace to use a young girl, a sixth former, in this way".

After the row

The Laura Spence Affair recurred in the headlines in the UK throughout the summer of 2000 (both before and after Brown's speech), and is arguably one of the major events that pushed 'widening participation' in Higher Education into the political spotlight in the United Kingdom. It also caused a party political row over a select committee report on higher education.

Spence's opinion

In 2001, Laura Spence made public her opinion that Oxford had been right to reject her admission on the basis of her interview, saying that she'd been "a bit upset when I came out of the interview because I knew I hadn't done as well as I thought I could have", It was later reported that she was studying medicine at the University of Cambridge.

Further Information

Get more info on 'Laura Spence Affair'.

External Link Exchanges

Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

<a href="http://laura_spence_affair.totallyexplained.com">Laura Spence Affair Totally Explained</a>

Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.